Not that it would have any practical utility

[garran]

Do you ever wish, when you're making a thumbnail to link to an image, that if, after clicking through that, you clicked again on the resultant picture, it would lead to a version that was correspondingly bigger, and so on, forever, as long as one cared to click? Or is that just me?

I have failed to set my alarm clock consistantly for the past three days, which is why I'm now posting at shortly past four in the morning (and making exactly the sort of post you'd expect for that). I'd best try to remedy that trend, or else school will do so, on Monday, in much the way that a brick wall remedies momentum.

Should I now try to make the post that I've been meaning to about various music? No, I should probably just try to go to bed.

Comments

[masamage.livejournal.com]

The first computer I ever learned to use, at about six years old, was a Unix named hpcvxhjb. It had an awesome little Fractal program that would show you an image, which you could select part of, and it would zoom in on that part, and then so on. I have no idea how common this sort of thing is, but I loved it.

It's not exactly what you're describing, and neither is the Infinite Cat Project Karen linked to recently, but both of those things are pretty cool.

I hope you get back to getting sleep. o.o What sort of classes will you do now?

[garran.livejournal.com]

Yeah, fractals don't count. (I used to have a similar program in early Windows, "WinFract", which took about half an hour to load the fractals. Uphill! Both ways! The old days were awesome.)


-Andy H.

[masamage.livejournal.com]

(In the snow! Buck naked!)

[tanetris.livejournal.com]

(with secret ninjabard techniques which prevent shrinkage, that he not be sad)